Abstract
Abstract:Current understandings of the tourist city reveal a pressing problem: touristification (or mass tourism) is generating significant friction between residents and visitors. This phenomenon disrupts the daily lives of both groups, leading to considerable environmental impact. Unfortunately, the primary focus in many tourist destinations remains narrow: economic development, often at the expense of social and environmental well-being. The prevalence and imposition of an anthropocene tourist city perspective has led to tourism activities damaging the natural ecosystems on which some cities are founded. Therefore, the degradation of biological systems demands a containment of human activity. This paper aims to question and reflect on the construction of a symbiocenic tourist city that lays the groundwork for a new tourism approach based on the cohabitation of species to streamline economic, educational, touristic, social, cultural, and, above all, environmental development, reproducing native and resilient settings as a model of ecological urbanism that shapes the post-human tourist city. It is concluded that tourist centers must maintain a multi-species hierarchical balance to regulate symbiosis in natural environments, exploring forms of urban planning to reconstruct scenarios marked by the urban footprint.
Keywords:Tourist city, Anthropocene, Symbiocene, Ecological urbanism
References
Albrecht, G. (2021). La visión de futuro de Glenn Albrech. Symbioscene. https://symbioscene.com/invitation-to-the-symbiocene/
Castro Salgado, S. A., & Vázquez Honorato, L. A. (2019). Arquitectura para el antropoceno. e-RUA, 11(19), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.25009/rua.v11i22.78
Delgado Ramos, G. (2019). Espacio urbano, medio ambiente y capital en la época del Antropoceno. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24(84), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2653168
Descola, P. (2017). ¿Humano, demasiado humano? Desacatos, (54), 16-27. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/139/13950920002.pdf
Fernández Galiano, L. (2016, 30 de noviembre). Arquitectura Viva. Arquitectura Viva. https://arquitecturaviva.com/articulos/antropoceno
García Moro, F. (2023). El antropoceno y el ocaso del sueño paramétrico. Revista de Arquitectura, 28(44), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5427.2023.70012
Luque Agraz, D. (2022). Turismo biocultural y la agenda global en la Era del Antropoceno. Revista de Alimentación Contemporánea y Desarrollo Regional, 32(59), 2-17. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/esracdr/v32n59/2395-9169-esracdr-32-59-e221210.pdf
Manteguiaga, C. (2020). Antropoceno y diseño. Cuaderno, (103), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi103.4143
Marsino, R. (2020). Para una arquitectura antropocénica: habitando infraestructuras del paisaje tecnológico de Atacama [Tesis de magíster, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile]. https://doi.org/10.7764/tesisUC/ARQ/48212
Meerow, S., & Newell, J. P. (2016). Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where and why? Urban Geography, 37(2), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
Simonetti, C. (2023). Un "futuro concreto" para la arquitectura en el antropoceno. Rizoma, (5), 50-61.
Svampa, M. (2019). El Antropoceno como diagnóstico y paradigma: lecturas globales desde el Sur. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 24(84), 33-53. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/279/27961130004/27961130004.pdf

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 e-rua

