Espacios adecuados para perros y gatos: consideraciones poshumanistas para el diseño urbano, arquitectónico y de interiores
PDF

Palabras clave

poshumanismo
posantropocentrismo
antrozoología
zoometría
zoociudades.

Resumen

Los perros y los gatos han habitado las ciudades durante milenios. Actualmente, centenares de millones desempeñan el rol de mascotas. Su presencia junto a los humanos ha generado significativos beneficios para las personas y para la sociedad. La economía mundial, la salud de los propietarios y la cohesión social son sus principales beneficiarios. Desde la década de 1960 la familia tradicional empezó a experimentar cambios en medio de los cuales las mascotas encontraron un lugar particular. Este lugar se fortaleció gracias a un gran cambio al que asistimos: somos testigos del paso del humanismo al poshumanismo, que exige la inclusión de especies no humanas en la vida urbana. Los resultados presentan las consideraciones que todo diseñador debe tener en cuenta para elaborar proyectos arquitectónicos y urbanos incluyentes con las mascotas. Se concluye que es prioritario incorporar estas consideraciones cuando se aborden proyectos con enfoque poshumanista en las escuelas de arquitectura.
https://doi.org/10.25009/e-rua.v16i05.240
PDF

Citas

Ambros, B. (2010). The necrogeography of pet memorial spaces: pets as liminal family members in contemporary Japan. Material religión, 6(3): 304-335. DOI: 10.2752/175183410X12862096296801

APPA. American Pet Products Association (2023). Pet Industry Market Size, Trends & Ownership Statistics. USA, Stamford: APPA. URL https://www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp

Arcken, B. C. (2011). Interacción entre humanos y animales. Revista de la Universidad de La Salle, 11(54), 149-159. URL https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=ruls

Atkins, P. (2016). Between the muzzle and the leash: Dog-walking, discipline, and the modern city. Animal Cities (pp. 235-256). Routledge. URL https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315567167-17/muzzle-leash-dog-walking-discipline-modern-city

AVMA. American Veterinary Medical Association (2023). Pet Ownership and Demographics. Sourcebook. USA, Washington: AVMA. URL https://ebusiness.avma.org/files/ProductDownloads/eco-pet-demographic-report-22-low-res.pdf

Beatley, T. & Bekoff, M. (2013). City planning and animals: expanding our urban compassion footprint. Ethics, design and planning of the built environment, 185-195. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5246-7_12 https://link.springer.com/

Bradshaw, J. (2017). The Animals Among Us: The New Science of Anthrozoology. London, UK: Penguin.

Brown, K. M. (2015). The role of landscape in regulating (ir)responsible conduct: moral geographies of the ‘proper control’ of dogs. Landscape Research, 40(1), 39-56. URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01426397.2013.829811

Beetz, A., Et al. (2012). Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: the possible role of oxytocin. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(234): 1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234

Bedford, E. (2020). Global dog and cat pet population 2018. Hamburg, Germany: Statista GmbH. URL https://www.statista.com/statistics/1044386/dog-and-cat-pet-population-worldwide/

Biswas, S. (2019). The benefits of pets for human health. Psychology and Behavioral Science, 13(3): 1-3. DOI: 10.19080/PBSIJ.2019.13.555862

Carter, S. B. (2016a). Planning for dogs in urban environments (Tesis doctoral). University of Melbourne. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350611001399

Carter, S. B. (2016b). Why planning limits its concern: a case study of planning for dogs in Melbourne, Australia. Australian Planner, 53(3), 251-259, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2016.1210658

Chen, S. Et al. (2022). Benefits and conflicts: a systematic review of dog park design and management strategies. Animals, 12(17), 2251. MDPI AG. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12172251

City of Clovis, California (1979). Dog Park Master Plan. City of Clovis, USA. URL https://cityofclovis.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Dog-Park-Master-Plan-Oct-2019.pdf

City of Toronto (2019). Pet Friendly Design Guidelines and Best Practices for New Multi-unit Buildings. Toronto, Canada: City of Toronto. URL https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/94d3-CityPlanning-Pet-Friendly-Guidelines.pdf

Clutton-Brock, J. (1995). Origins of the dog: The archaeological evidence. In: J. Serpell (Ed), The Domestic Dog. Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 7-20). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. URL https://www.google.com.co/books/edition/The_Domestic_Dog/4fB7DQAAQBAJ?hl=es&gbpv=1&dq=The+Domestic+Dog.+Its+evolution,+behaviour+and+interactions+with+people&printsec=frontcover

Delon, N. (2021). Animal capabilities and freedom in the city. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 22(1), 131-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2020.1869190

Dev, R. (2016). The ekistics of animal and human conflict. New Delhi, India: Copal Publishing Group. URL https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=xQMKDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=related:9vHpkG8ADXsJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=jPnfc3jxGl&sig=ZoO22voX7jxV6HH4-8rkvViTkNQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

Driscoll, C. A., Et al. (2009a). From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(1), 9971–9978. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901586106

Driscoll, C. A., Et al. (2009b). The Taming of the Cat. Scientific American 300(6): 68-75. URL https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cnso_bio_facarticles/477

Emel, J. & Urbanik, J. (2010). Animal geographies: exploring the spaces and places of human-animal encounters. New York, NY: Lantern Books. URL https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=iLo-Dph9e8QC&oi=fnd&pg=PA202&dq=related:9vHpkG8ADXsJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=MTr-xgUPSD&sig=BC9kNG0r8yJu8_hRXT2mT2f2ynU#v=onepage&q&f=false

Fediaf. European Pet Food (2021). Facts & Figures 2021. Belgium, Brussels: FEDIAF. URL https://www.dropbox.com/s/h3vapzfju5j8vei/Facts%20and%20Figures%202021.pdf?dl=0

Fortune (2021). Pet care market size. United Kingdom: Fortune Business Insights. URL https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/pet-care-market-104749

Fox, R. M. (2006). Cultural geographies of pet-keeping (Tesis doctoral). Royal Holloway, University of London). https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.430441

Fraser-Miller, Et al. (2021). Feeding the team: Analysis of a Spratt’s dog cake from Antarctica. Polar Record, 57(e19), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247421000103

Greenberg, A. (enero 7 de 2020). How Dog Parks Took Over the Urban Landscape. Smithsonian Magazine. URL https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-dog-parks-took-over-urban-landscape-180973902/

GFK. Growth from Knowledge (2016). Pet ownership. Global GFK Survey. Germany, Nuremberg: GFK. URL https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/2405078/cms-pdfs/fileadmin/user_upload/country_one_pager/nl/documents/global-gfk-survey_pet-ownership_2016.pdf

Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: breve historia del mañana. Madrid: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial España.

Health for animals. Global animal health association (2022). Global State of Pet Care. Stats, Facts and Trends. Brussels, Belgium: Health for animals. URL https://www.healthforanimals.org/reports/pet-care-report/global-trends-in-the-pet-population/

Holmberg, T. (2015). Urban animals: Crowding in zoocities. London, UK: Routledge. URL https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uJysBwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=related:9vHpkG8ADXsJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=Jc16msS_TC&sig=pguwsg5oEiLoYuaFfLQ2dZ-VqYE#v=onepage&q&f=false

Instone, L. (2011). Regulating rover: legislating the public place of urban pet dogs. Austl. Animal Protection LJ, 6, p.75. URL https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/ausanplj6&id=72&men_tab=srchresults

Instone, L. & Sweeney, J. (2014a). Dog waste, wasted dogs: the contribution of human–dog relations to the political ecology of Australian urban space. Geographical Research, 52(4), 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12059

Instone, L. & Sweeney, J. (2014b). The trouble with dogs: ‘animaling’ public space in the Australian city. Continuum, 28(6), 774-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.966404

Jacobo Ladino, S. (2019). Urban dog (Tesis de Pregrado). Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia. URL https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/handle/1992/45685?show=full

Jackson, V. S. (1994). Domestic pets in new urban areas: the role of urban design in successful pet ownership. Australian Planner, 31(3), 148-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.1994.9657625

Jackson, V. S. (1995a). Public open spaces and dogs. Australian Parks & Recreation, 31(4), 11-14. URL https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19961803407

Jackson, V. S. (1995b). Guidelines for designing and managing public open space. Urban Animal Management Conference Proceedings. URL http://www.myxyz.org/phmurphy/dog/OpenSpace%20for%20dogs.pdf

Jackson, V. S. (1996). Facilitar la propiedad de mascotas a través de un mejor diseño de viviendas. Diario de la Asociación Médica Veterinaria Americana, 209(6), 1076-1079. URL https://europepmc.org/article/med/8800251

Jackson, V. S. (1998). Making room for pets in high and medium density housing - the role of urban planning. Urban Animal Management Conference Proceedings. URL https://aiam.org.au/resources/Documents/1998%20UAM/PUB_Pro98_VirginiaJackson02.pdf

Kean, H. (2020). Human and animal space in historic pet cemeteries in London, New York and Paris. In Jay Johnston (Ed) Animal Death. Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press. DOI: 10.2307/J.CTT1GXXPVF.8

Mars Petcare & Nashville Civic Design Center (2019). A Playbook For Pet-Friendly Cities. Nashville, USA: Mars Petcare. URL https://www.bettercitiesforpets.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Mars-Petcare-Playbook-For-Pet-Friendly-Cities-2019-LR.pdf

McConnell, Et al. (2019). We Are Family: Viewing Pets as Family Members Improves Wellbeing. Anthrozoos, 32(4): 459-470. DOI: 10.1080/08927936.2019.1621516

McCormack, G. R., Et al. (2011). Access to off-leash parks, street pattern and dog walking among adults. Public Health, 125(8), 540-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2011.04.008

McNeill, A. T. Et al. (2016). Dingoes at the doorstep: home range sizes and activity patterns of dingoes and other wild dogs around urban areas of north-eastern Australia. Animals, 6(8), 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6080048

Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Minsalud (2017). Lineamientos para la política de tenencia responsable de animales de compañía y de producción. Bogotá, Colombia: Minsalud. URL https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/SA/lineamientos-tenencia-responsables-acy.pdf

Ministerio de Transporte de Colombia. Mintransporte (2022). Guía para el transporte de animales y mascotas. Colombia, Bogotá: Mintransporte. URL https://www.supertransporte.gov.co/documentos/2021/Agosto/DelegaturaPU_06/Guia-para-el-Transporte-de-Animales-y-Mascotas_.pdf

Nayar, P. K. (2018). Posthumanism. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Oliver, C. Et al. (2021). Introduction to the urban ecologies open collection: A call for contributions on methods, ethics, and design in geographical research with urban animals. Geo: Geography and Environment, 8(2), e00101. URL https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/geo2.101

Patterson, M. (2002). Walking the dog: an urban ethnography of owners and their dogs in the glebe (“Where Can Lassie Go?” Territoriality and Contested Spaces). Alternate Routes, 18, 5-70. https://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/article/view/20345

Paxton, D. (1994). Community involvement and urban dogs: some ideas (pp. 103-112). Urban animal management: Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Urban Animal Management in Canberra, Australia. URL https://aiam.org.au/resources/Documents/1994%20UAM/PUB_Pro94_DavidPaxton.pdf

Phillips, S. (2002). Can Pets Function as Family Members? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24(6): 621-638. DOI: 10.1177/019394502236636

Purewal, R., Et al. (2017). Companion animals and child/adolescent development: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(234): 1-25. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14030234

Rossamakhina, A. (2021). Análisis de viabilidad para la creación de un establecimiento hotelero petfriendly en la ciudad de Valencia. (Tesis de pregrado), Universitat Politècnica de València, España. URL https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/171639

Serpell, J. A. (2014). Domestication and history of the cat. In: D. T. Turner and P. Bateson (Ed), The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour (pp. 83-100). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. URL https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297163879_Domestication_and_history_of_the_cat

Steffan, P. G., Et al. (2021). Prehistoria: desde el origen de la humanidad hasta el surgimiento de las sociedades complejas. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tandil: Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. URL https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/163299

Urbanik, J. & Morgan, M. (2013). A tale of tails: The place of dog parks in the urban imaginary. Geoforum, 44, 292-302. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718512001765

Yurttas, N. B. & Altuncu, D. (2022). New possibilities of living together in post-humanist society: Interior and furniture design for pets. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture & Planning, 3(3): 281-294. DOI: 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i3058

Zhang, S. (2019). How Design Impacts the Social Environment: A Comparison Between Two Pet Cafés in China and the United States. [Tesis de maestría] Arizona State University. URL https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/286400758.hapter/10.1007/978-94-007-5246-7_12

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.