Espacios adecuados para perros y gatos: consideraciones poshumanistas para el diseño urbano, arquitectónico y de interiores
Resumen
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Ambros, B. (2010). The necrogeography of pet memorial spaces: pets as liminal family members in contemporary Japan. Material religión, 6(3): 304-335. DOI: 10.2752/175183410X12862096296801
APPA. American Pet Products Association (2023). Pet Industry Market Size, Trends & Ownership Statistics. USA, Stamford: APPA. URL https://www.americanpetproducts.org/press_industrytrends.asp
Arcken, B. C. (2011). Interacción entre humanos y animales. Revista de la Universidad de La Salle, 11(54), 149-159. URL https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=ruls
Atkins, P. (2016). Between the muzzle and the leash: Dog-walking, discipline, and the modern city. Animal Cities (pp. 235-256). Routledge. URL https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315567167-17/muzzle-leash-dog-walking-discipline-modern-city
AVMA. American Veterinary Medical Association (2023). Pet Ownership and Demographics. Sourcebook. USA, Washington: AVMA. URL https://ebusiness.avma.org/files/ProductDownloads/eco-pet-demographic-report-22-low-res.pdf
Beatley, T. & Bekoff, M. (2013). City planning and animals: expanding our urban compassion footprint. Ethics, design and planning of the built environment, 185-195. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5246-7_12 https://link.springer.com/
Bradshaw, J. (2017). The Animals Among Us: The New Science of Anthrozoology. London, UK: Penguin.
Brown, K. M. (2015). The role of landscape in regulating (ir)responsible conduct: moral geographies of the ‘proper control’ of dogs. Landscape Research, 40(1), 39-56. URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01426397.2013.829811
Beetz, A., Et al. (2012). Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: the possible role of oxytocin. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(234): 1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234
Bedford, E. (2020). Global dog and cat pet population 2018. Hamburg, Germany: Statista GmbH. URL https://www.statista.com/statistics/1044386/dog-and-cat-pet-population-worldwide/
Biswas, S. (2019). The benefits of pets for human health. Psychology and Behavioral Science, 13(3): 1-3. DOI: 10.19080/PBSIJ.2019.13.555862
Carter, S. B. (2016a). Planning for dogs in urban environments (Tesis doctoral). University of Melbourne. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350611001399
Carter, S. B. (2016b). Why planning limits its concern: a case study of planning for dogs in Melbourne, Australia. Australian Planner, 53(3), 251-259, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2016.1210658
Chen, S. Et al. (2022). Benefits and conflicts: a systematic review of dog park design and management strategies. Animals, 12(17), 2251. MDPI AG. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12172251
City of Clovis, California (1979). Dog Park Master Plan. City of Clovis, USA. URL https://cityofclovis.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Dog-Park-Master-Plan-Oct-2019.pdf
City of Toronto (2019). Pet Friendly Design Guidelines and Best Practices for New Multi-unit Buildings. Toronto, Canada: City of Toronto. URL https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/94d3-CityPlanning-Pet-Friendly-Guidelines.pdf
Clutton-Brock, J. (1995). Origins of the dog: The archaeological evidence. In: J. Serpell (Ed), The Domestic Dog. Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people (pp. 7-20). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. URL https://www.google.com.co/books/edition/The_Domestic_Dog/4fB7DQAAQBAJ?hl=es&gbpv=1&dq=The+Domestic+Dog.+Its+evolution,+behaviour+and+interactions+with+people&printsec=frontcover
Delon, N. (2021). Animal capabilities and freedom in the city. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 22(1), 131-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2020.1869190
Dev, R. (2016). The ekistics of animal and human conflict. New Delhi, India: Copal Publishing Group. URL https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=xQMKDQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=related:9vHpkG8ADXsJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=jPnfc3jxGl&sig=ZoO22voX7jxV6HH4-8rkvViTkNQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
Driscoll, C. A., Et al. (2009a). From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(1), 9971–9978. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0901586106
Driscoll, C. A., Et al. (2009b). The Taming of the Cat. Scientific American 300(6): 68-75. URL https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cnso_bio_facarticles/477
Emel, J. & Urbanik, J. (2010). Animal geographies: exploring the spaces and places of human-animal encounters. New York, NY: Lantern Books. URL https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=iLo-Dph9e8QC&oi=fnd&pg=PA202&dq=related:9vHpkG8ADXsJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=MTr-xgUPSD&sig=BC9kNG0r8yJu8_hRXT2mT2f2ynU#v=onepage&q&f=false
Fediaf. European Pet Food (2021). Facts & Figures 2021. Belgium, Brussels: FEDIAF. URL https://www.dropbox.com/s/h3vapzfju5j8vei/Facts%20and%20Figures%202021.pdf?dl=0
Fortune (2021). Pet care market size. United Kingdom: Fortune Business Insights. URL https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/pet-care-market-104749
Fox, R. M. (2006). Cultural geographies of pet-keeping (Tesis doctoral). Royal Holloway, University of London). https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.430441
Fraser-Miller, Et al. (2021). Feeding the team: Analysis of a Spratt’s dog cake from Antarctica. Polar Record, 57(e19), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247421000103
Greenberg, A. (enero 7 de 2020). How Dog Parks Took Over the Urban Landscape. Smithsonian Magazine. URL https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-dog-parks-took-over-urban-landscape-180973902/
GFK. Growth from Knowledge (2016). Pet ownership. Global GFK Survey. Germany, Nuremberg: GFK. URL https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/2405078/cms-pdfs/fileadmin/user_upload/country_one_pager/nl/documents/global-gfk-survey_pet-ownership_2016.pdf
Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: breve historia del mañana. Madrid: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial España.
Health for animals. Global animal health association (2022). Global State of Pet Care. Stats, Facts and Trends. Brussels, Belgium: Health for animals. URL https://www.healthforanimals.org/reports/pet-care-report/global-trends-in-the-pet-population/
Holmberg, T. (2015). Urban animals: Crowding in zoocities. London, UK: Routledge. URL https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uJysBwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=related:9vHpkG8ADXsJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=Jc16msS_TC&sig=pguwsg5oEiLoYuaFfLQ2dZ-VqYE#v=onepage&q&f=false
Instone, L. (2011). Regulating rover: legislating the public place of urban pet dogs. Austl. Animal Protection LJ, 6, p.75. URL https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/ausanplj6&id=72&men_tab=srchresults
Instone, L. & Sweeney, J. (2014a). Dog waste, wasted dogs: the contribution of human–dog relations to the political ecology of Australian urban space. Geographical Research, 52(4), 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12059
Instone, L. & Sweeney, J. (2014b). The trouble with dogs: ‘animaling’ public space in the Australian city. Continuum, 28(6), 774-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.966404
Jacobo Ladino, S. (2019). Urban dog (Tesis de Pregrado). Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia. URL https://repositorio.uniandes.edu.co/handle/1992/45685?show=full
Jackson, V. S. (1994). Domestic pets in new urban areas: the role of urban design in successful pet ownership. Australian Planner, 31(3), 148-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.1994.9657625
Jackson, V. S. (1995a). Public open spaces and dogs. Australian Parks & Recreation, 31(4), 11-14. URL https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19961803407
Jackson, V. S. (1995b). Guidelines for designing and managing public open space. Urban Animal Management Conference Proceedings. URL http://www.myxyz.org/phmurphy/dog/OpenSpace%20for%20dogs.pdf
Jackson, V. S. (1996). Facilitar la propiedad de mascotas a través de un mejor diseño de viviendas. Diario de la Asociación Médica Veterinaria Americana, 209(6), 1076-1079. URL https://europepmc.org/article/med/8800251
Jackson, V. S. (1998). Making room for pets in high and medium density housing - the role of urban planning. Urban Animal Management Conference Proceedings. URL https://aiam.org.au/resources/Documents/1998%20UAM/PUB_Pro98_VirginiaJackson02.pdf
Kean, H. (2020). Human and animal space in historic pet cemeteries in London, New York and Paris. In Jay Johnston (Ed) Animal Death. Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press. DOI: 10.2307/J.CTT1GXXPVF.8
Mars Petcare & Nashville Civic Design Center (2019). A Playbook For Pet-Friendly Cities. Nashville, USA: Mars Petcare. URL https://www.bettercitiesforpets.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Mars-Petcare-Playbook-For-Pet-Friendly-Cities-2019-LR.pdf
McConnell, Et al. (2019). We Are Family: Viewing Pets as Family Members Improves Wellbeing. Anthrozoos, 32(4): 459-470. DOI: 10.1080/08927936.2019.1621516
McCormack, G. R., Et al. (2011). Access to off-leash parks, street pattern and dog walking among adults. Public Health, 125(8), 540-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2011.04.008
McNeill, A. T. Et al. (2016). Dingoes at the doorstep: home range sizes and activity patterns of dingoes and other wild dogs around urban areas of north-eastern Australia. Animals, 6(8), 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6080048
Ministerio de Salud de Colombia. Minsalud (2017). Lineamientos para la política de tenencia responsable de animales de compañía y de producción. Bogotá, Colombia: Minsalud. URL https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/SA/lineamientos-tenencia-responsables-acy.pdf
Ministerio de Transporte de Colombia. Mintransporte (2022). Guía para el transporte de animales y mascotas. Colombia, Bogotá: Mintransporte. URL https://www.supertransporte.gov.co/documentos/2021/Agosto/DelegaturaPU_06/Guia-para-el-Transporte-de-Animales-y-Mascotas_.pdf
Nayar, P. K. (2018). Posthumanism. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Oliver, C. Et al. (2021). Introduction to the urban ecologies open collection: A call for contributions on methods, ethics, and design in geographical research with urban animals. Geo: Geography and Environment, 8(2), e00101. URL https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/geo2.101
Patterson, M. (2002). Walking the dog: an urban ethnography of owners and their dogs in the glebe (“Where Can Lassie Go?” Territoriality and Contested Spaces). Alternate Routes, 18, 5-70. https://www.alternateroutes.ca/index.php/ar/article/view/20345
Paxton, D. (1994). Community involvement and urban dogs: some ideas (pp. 103-112). Urban animal management: Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Urban Animal Management in Canberra, Australia. URL https://aiam.org.au/resources/Documents/1994%20UAM/PUB_Pro94_DavidPaxton.pdf
Phillips, S. (2002). Can Pets Function as Family Members? Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24(6): 621-638. DOI: 10.1177/019394502236636
Purewal, R., Et al. (2017). Companion animals and child/adolescent development: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(234): 1-25. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14030234
Rossamakhina, A. (2021). Análisis de viabilidad para la creación de un establecimiento hotelero petfriendly en la ciudad de Valencia. (Tesis de pregrado), Universitat Politècnica de València, España. URL https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/171639
Serpell, J. A. (2014). Domestication and history of the cat. In: D. T. Turner and P. Bateson (Ed), The Domestic Cat: The Biology of its Behaviour (pp. 83-100). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. URL https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297163879_Domestication_and_history_of_the_cat
Steffan, P. G., Et al. (2021). Prehistoria: desde el origen de la humanidad hasta el surgimiento de las sociedades complejas. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tandil: Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. URL https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/163299
Urbanik, J. & Morgan, M. (2013). A tale of tails: The place of dog parks in the urban imaginary. Geoforum, 44, 292-302. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718512001765
Yurttas, N. B. & Altuncu, D. (2022). New possibilities of living together in post-humanist society: Interior and furniture design for pets. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture & Planning, 3(3): 281-294. DOI: 10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i3058
Zhang, S. (2019). How Design Impacts the Social Environment: A Comparison Between Two Pet Cafés in China and the United States. [Tesis de maestría] Arizona State University. URL https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/286400758.hapter/10.1007/978-94-007-5246-7_12
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25009/e-rua.v16i05.240
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Añadir comentario
Soporte electrónico
ISSN: 2954-4149
https://rua.uv.mx/index.php/rua/index
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.
Las opiniones expresadas por los autores no reflejan la postura de los editores de la publicación. Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de los artículos aquí presentados, siempre y cuando se cite la fuente completa y su dirección electrónica.